Home -> Aaron -> ClassSeries -> 2008
Dharma & Meditation: Deepening Practice November 18, 2008 Class Five
Keywords:
Refuges, sila/moral awareness, Eightfold Path, ahimsa, satyagraha,
Aaron:
Good evening. My blessings and love to you. We've been talking for
several weeks about the refuges and the Four Noble Truths and
specifically the Eightfold Path, and how they all come together to
support your practice. You understand that no one piece of the dhamma
stands alone, it's all interconnected.
The
Eightfold Path aspects of sila, panna, and samadhi are refuges.
Consider the inner refuge of sila, knowing your own commitment to
living your life without harm, and the refuge of sila within your
sangha, knowing that others have thusly committed. Consider the
refuge of samadhi, let us call it of the quiet mind and of awareness.
And the refuge of your blossoming wisdom that begins to deeply
understand the dharma that Ajahn Sumedho has written about in your
reading for tonight. He notes, "This is how it is." This is how
the body is; this is how the mind is. Sometimes there's alertness,
sometimes the mind is sleepy. Sometimes the body is energized and
sometimes it's low in energy. Sometimes there is calmness and
tranquility, sometimes the immediate experience is that of agitation.
From a standpoint of growing wisdom, it doesn't matter what is
experienced but how you walk through that experience, which is what
Ajahn Sumedho expresses so clearly. To watch the judging mind without
judgment; to watch the opinions and preferences; not to get caught in
self-belief that you are the personality self; this is the start of
true wisdom.
This
is very different than a denial of one experience. There's no
suppression in the experience but only the fullest presence with it,
but there's no enhancement of the experience. If there's anger,
there's no need to blame one's self or another or to enhance the
anger, and there's no need to stop the anger. Here is where wisdom
develops. Whatever has arisen is the result of conditions; it's
impermanent; it's not self.
There's
one place I especially marked here to read to you... (lower 139; top
140)
"Notice
what it's like when you're open to emotional feelings, to moods,
without judging them, without making any problem out of them or
trying to get rid of them, change them or think about them. Just
totally accept the mood you're in, the emotional state or the
physical sensations.... When I do this I notice the "changingness."
When you willing to let something be the way it is, it changes."
The
question then arises, when you are willing to be with things as they
are, not trying to fix, when and how do you act in moral ways in the
world? We have a commitment to sila, which means not only actively
not to harm but not to allow harm. If you see somebody slapping a
child, do you sit and say, "Anger is coming. Seeing, unpleasant.
This is just the way it is."? What steps forth and says no to the
observed abusive acts?
We
have to understand these teachings in terms of living them in a way
that doesn't create more unwholesome karma for oneself and others,
and that doesn't create more of an ego personality that believes,
"I did this. He was slapping his child and I stepped in and
I stopped him. Aren't I good? Did anybody notice?"
When
you note that those questions are also present, "Should I act?"
just know doubt, the direct experience of doubt. Knowing fear,
knowing confusion. As Ajahn Sumedho said in what I just read, when
you watch, you notice that it all changes. It is out of this basis
that compassionate action can arise, compassionate action that does
not have a basis in self but in this "one who knows."
I
like the Thai, that phrasing of it. Ajahn Chah was apparently quite
known for his speaking about "poo roo", the one who knows.
A
friend of ours many years ago had gone to India to be on retreat with
Goenka. This is probably 40 years ago. The day before the retreat was
to begin and various meditators were gathering in the town where the
retreat would be held, she was walking in the street when she saw a
car hit a puppy. The puppy began to yelp and scream. It was lying in
the road just crying. Nobody paid attention.
She
ran out into the street and picked up this small puppy. It was
bleeding on her, it was crying. She got out of traffic and she stood
there saying aloud, "I don't know what to do. I don't know what
to do. I don't know what to do." She was feeling quite frantic
when suddenly she felt a hand on her shoulder from behind, and a very
quiet voice said, "You do know what to do." And that was it. She
knew there was somebody there but not who. A voice, a hand, and then
gone. But right there with the "I don't know what to do," that
voice reminded her, "Yes, I do know what to do. A puppy this young,
it must have a mother somewhere nearby. Let me see if I can find the
mother."
So
she looked behind bushes and fences and so forth and she found the
mother dog with several other puppies in the litter. She laid the
puppy down and the mother began to wash the puppy, attend to the
puppy. The puppy nuzzled in to nurse. She says she realized that at
first she did not know what to do. The ego was looking for an answer;
the ego did not know what to do. But at a deeper level she did know
what to do. So skillful and compassionate action from the place of no
self was possible.
It's
so important to remember this, right there when you don't know what
to do from the ego perspective, if you simply let it settle, knowing
doubt, knowing tension, that which does know what to do will come
forth.
As
an interesting afterword; the next morning she went to the meditation
center and sat in the room with others. She was sitting with her eyes
closed waiting for Goinka to appear. Suddenly she heard a voice from
the front of the room, "Good morning!" And of course it was the
"You do know what to do" voice. It was Goenka.
There
are so many "do-gooders" in the world who make a mess of things
because they're working from a place of fear. They're trying but
they're working from the ego self and trying to push this and pull
that. Everybody has conflicting views about how it should be done.
There are those who back up and say, "I can't do anything because
I don't know what to do. I will just sit and watch everything and
see it arise and pass away." But that is equally unwholesome. One
does have to participate in the world. But the self doesn't
participate, love participates, and kindness.
The
Eightfold Path will steer you through this dilemma of, "I know what
to do; I'm going to do this," versus "I can't act, I don't
know what to do." The Eightfold Path is your guide. It's not just
a meditation guide; it's a practical life guide, to work with sila,
with centered awareness, and with wisdom.
In
another place in the book, in the chapter that you were assigned, he
speaks of the duality of eternalism versus nihilism. In a sense, this
is what we're talking about; the eternalism that says, "I have to
get it right," emphasis on the I, "I have to get it
right," and thinks of the self that's a solid self and either
it's good or it's bad; versus the nihilism that says not just
there's no self. There's nothing, so no action is possible.
But
of course there's something. Is there anybody who is on sitting in
this room? Are you here? What is here? What are you? What are you?
Q:
An angel.
Aaron:
An angel. Are you sure? Okay.
What
are you?
Q:
A human being.
Aaron:
Are you sure?
Q:
No.
Aaron:
Were you a human being 70 years ago? What were you then?
Q:
Spirit.
Aaron:
What are you?
Q:
A person sitting in a room.
Aaron:
At one level, yes. I'm not going to go all the way around, you
understand what I'm asking. We keep asking this question, "What
am I?" and there's no right answer, of course, but you can begin
to dispense with what you are not. That doesn't mean that the body
doesn't exist, only that it is not the essence of what you are. The
emotions are not the essence of what you are. Don't take them so
personally. Like Q said, you are angels. Perhaps that's closest to
the correct answer, and yet even that is so much of a capsule that it
doesn't catch the whole thing. You are energy, you are light, you
are intelligence, you are love.
Q:
I thought we were angels in earthsuits.
Aaron:
Yes, but that's just a capsule. It's my summation of what you
are, yes. But what is an angel in an earthsuit? What is an angel? We
know what an earthsuit is–what is an angel?
So
you are energy and light and intelligence and love. You are the
expression of the divine in the world, the expression of God or
Goddess.
I
just want to point out that it comes to the same question–people
can lean toward nihilism or toward an eternalism that believes in an
infinite soul that exists and comes into a body and then dies out of
a body and comes into a body but will exist forever. But in my
experience even that soul is impermanent. When the soul itself
dissolves, it doesn't cease any more than the flower ceases to
exist after death. When the flower dies and decays into the soil so
it's just dust, there's no more visual experience of flower left.
It's completely broken up into tiny particles. And yet it nurtures
the soil. It hasn't ceased to exist. The large tree that decays
into the soil, does it cease to exist? (Q: No)
I
don't want you to think of the soul as something eternal, either,
because it fosters too much belief in the self, and it's too easy
to get caught up in confusing the personality with the soul.
You
are light. That light that you are can never cease and it will take
different forms. Yes, for what may seem an eternity to you, for a
great number of lifetimes, this particular intelligence and energy
and light moves sometimes into a new form and sometimes out of that
form, and the spirit comes back into form again. But don't start
thinking about that eternal soul that's going to knock on the gates
one day and say, "Can I come into heaven now?"
This
is hard to explain because you do not cease to exist. It brings us
back to Ajahn Sumedho's intuitive awareness. That awareness
continues. You might ask, "Is the awareness not the same as the
soul?" That's a semantic issue; I can't say it is, I can't
say it isn't–how do you define soul? The soul is not the
personality. The soul is not the habit energies. Nevertheless,
there's something that exists, so we look back into awareness –
that presence when there's no thought, but full presence – and
out of that presence, knowing what to do.
There's
a story that I very much like, of a Zen master who sat with a group
of his students around a table at a meeting in a room where there
were several open windows. There were some papers on the table. The
wind blowing in the window picked up an important piece of paper and
carried it the length of the table.
This
elder Zen master had been sitting with his eyes closed, and the
younger people were lovingly smiling, "The old man is asleep."
The wind stirred, the papers rustled. One lifted up and nobody moved
as they watched it fly down the table. But this elderly Zen master,
eyes closed, just (sound effect) grabbed it, set it back down,
closed his eyes again.
Presence.
At some level, something probably registered–breeze touching,
hearing. Maybe hearing the "Oh!" gasp of people as all the papers
started to fly. Presence.
So
it is this presence, intention to sila, and deep wisdom that inform
your actions in the world and that inform your practice. This is the
place where "you," this love and light and intelligence, does
know what to do.
Let's
have some questions now and then a break, and Barbara will come back
to lead the discussion part of the class. But are there questions for
me?
Q:
Could you talk a little bit more about each part of the Eightfold
Path?
Aaron:
Let's save that for the later discussion and go around and let each
of you talk about one piece of the Eightfold Path, clarify it for
yourselves. Any others?
Q:
Not a question, but I've found it very helpful to think about
action directed by the ego vs. action directed by the Watcher, the
energy of the non-ego. It's very helpful...
Aaron:
That's a very important distinction. After Barbara taught in
Seattle this weekend, on Sunday night after the retreat some friends
asked her to talk more about some of her experiences in the south in
the '60s.
They
began to talk about ahimsa,
dynamic compassion. Ahimsa recognizes that the question is not
whether one acts or refrains from acting but who or what acts, and
that harm is done by withholding action just as by acting. So the
question is not whether we act or do not act but whether the choice
is made from the deepest place of wisdom and love, and trusting that
"I know what to do." And what comes forth may be different from
one person to another. That "I know what to do" is not one right
action but the expression of the soul's highest truth.
So
when we speak of the Eightfold Path's "Right Action," we must
not think of it in terms of one action that's right and everything
else that's wrong, but action that comes from this place of love
and wisdom.
Barbara
was pointing out that one of the greatest challenges in that work is
that many people would be centered and clear and acting from a loving
place, and others sitting beside them on a Freedom Ride bus or lunch
counter would not understand this at all and would be acting very
much from a place of self-righteousness that accused others, "My
way is right, your way is wrong!" It was that ego voice that
inspired the violence.
So
she talked about the situations that were highly volatile, in which
instead of the action involving a large group of people, there were
just a small group who were very clear. And seeing that with the
power of love, Gandhi's satyagraha, with the power of that love, I
would not say always but often, there was not violence. When the
action came from a clear and loving place for all who were offering
the action, more often than not there was not violence. When the
action came from a person's ego place, much more often there was
violence, even though they were saying, "We will not be violent."
We won't be violent but we'll simply stick ourselves here in the
middle of your lunch counter. But there was just an attitude, an
energy, of belligerence.
This
to me is the heart of why you do this dharma practice. You are
learning how to be in the world from this centered place of love and
wisdom. It really is the only hope for the world. If enough of you
learn it and pass it on to others, the world can heal itself.
Thank
you. Any other questions or sharing?
Q:
We are beings of energy and light. And we come and go in and out of
incarnation. So when we die, where does the energy and light go?
Aaron:
It remains with you... Let's look at the skandas. The aggregate of
form. That releases, of course; the body dies. The mental aggregate.
When you die the mental aggregate remains, but it changes. There are
different kinds of thoughts. Sometimes there are angry thoughts;
sometimes there are loving thoughts. The mental aggregate does not
disappear but you learn that the thought is impermanent, not to
believe in your thoughts and not to self-identify with them.
I
said that the physical body disappears but the energy body doesn't
disappear. The physical body goes. The energy body remains. In a
sense, the chakras remain; they're simply not grounded in a
material form during the period of disembodiment.
Consciousness
remains. You are not your consciousness. It's one of the skandas.
Consciousness changes. So consciousness remains on the non-material
plane, on the astral plane, but there's less self-identification
with it. You don't suddenly become devoid of personality on the
astral plane but you regard your personality with a smile. You are
not hooked into believing that it's self and permanent; it's just
another conditioned aspect.
As
you move through these densities that I've mentioned, finally into
6th density –– for example, for me as a 6th
density being, certainly I have energy. You've felt my energy, you
know I have energy. I have a mind but there's no
self-identification with the mind at all. I've said to you that
people have asked me, what do I do when I'm not busy with Barbara?
And I say, "I take vacation. I go on retreat." In essence I move
into 7th density. I drop all sense of personality and
thought, I rest in that spaciousness that some of you experience
during meditation when everything dissolves. I just rest in that
space. If there's some urgency I come back into this 6th
density expression; otherwise I rest in spaciousness.
I've
said that I cannot describe 8th density because it's a
path of no return. I've not been in 8th density. The 8th
density form is simply letting go of everything, yet I know that
those who have moved into 8th density, while they no
longer have any personal expression –– I cannot talk to them ––
I can feel their energy as the grounding of everything. It's not
that they cease to exist.
Think
of a forest 1000 years old. Are all the trees that died 1000, 900,
800, 700 years ago still there? Where are they? They've decayed
into the forest floor. Where are they?
Q:
Where else could they go?
Aaron:
Nowhere, they're there. Nothing dies, nothing disappears; it just
changes its expression.
Q:
So the astral plane, is that right here with the earth plane, mixed
in?
Aaron:
Yes and no. I'm on the astral plane and I'm right here. Let us
bring this discussion back to our vipassana practice. Come tomorrow
night and we'll answer some of these questions in the general
evening of spiritual inquiry. Let's stay focused on vipassana and
dharma here. Tomorrow night, the broader range of questions.
Okay,
a 5 minute stretch...My blessings and love to you all. (recording
ends)
Class
discussion of the Eighfold Path and the reading not recorded.
|